ACT 1: The Brief (orientation)
ACT2: Pathways to Product (problem formation)
ACT3: Big Picture Thinking (research)
Final Remarks (outcomes, reflection)
“Compelling Story” ≠ Marketing Fluff:
Required a narrative that felt authentic to ASICS’ DNA (innovation for athletes’ longevity) and culturally relevant (rising demand for women’s sports equity).
Elevating ASICS Meant Reclaiming Legacy
The brand’s technical prowess (e.g., Gel-Kayano) was overshadowed by Nike/Adidas’ “cool factor.” Thus: Tie innovation to human struggle.
Product Cohesion = Solving a Single Problem:
Focus on injury prevention/recovery, levering areas where ASICS already had credibility, and introduce novelty
Building a story starts with understanding the brand, its past, heritage, current stand and what it’s missing:
for us, it meant distilling the brand down to a short story, something in literature called flash fiction